Dave Jones wrote:
A coincidence I hope. I'm not sure how increased timing resolution could
cause the drifting effects you've observed. I've also not noticed
any other similar reports (yet?).
Dave
Dave,
As you have appeared here, could you please comment why HZ was changed?
I have some confusion on this.
First, the upstream kernel has this changed (since 2.6.13 ?) in backward
direction, i.e. from 1000 to 250.
Second, why Fedora's change is implemented just now (in the middle of
life cycle), but not at distro release boundary?
And finally, why 1000Hz even for i586 kernel? Does anybody use i586
machine for low-latency tasks? Or even desktop now?
Regards,
Dmitry Butskoy
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/DmitryButskoy
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
