Re: gstreamer-plugins-good and (the lack of) taglib

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Christopher Aillon wrote:
> Bob Richmond wrote:
>> The only problem I can think of in introducing this patch is the
>> dirtiness of making a package from Extras be a build requirement of a
>> package in core. Is this generally frowned upon?
> 
> Until the Extras/Core dichotomy is merged, yes.

Alternatively, you can make some sort of gstreamer-plugins-good-extras
that includes only the taglib bits, and submit that to Extras.  Not
ideal, but it should do the trick.

-- Rex

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux