On Fri, 2006-11-17 at 23:41 +0100, Bernardo Innocenti wrote: > David Nielsen wrote: > > >>> So I could definitely see why many KDE users would feel the same way > >>> about Konqi. Luckily this one of those things that will naturally > >>> resolve itself once Core and Extras gets merged, if the community by > >>> then wants KDE to have Konqi as the default then that will happen. > >> This might make a good candidate for firstboot - during firstboot the > >> person installing the system could choose the default apps that newly > >> created users would get. > > > > Dear heavens no.. One of the strengths of the Fedora desktop is it's > > predefined standards. If you like me want a different set of > > applications there's the customize now/later option during install. > > Besides, choosing a web browser and a MUA is a per-user action; > It doesn't belong to firstboot, which is a system-wide thing. In firstboot, you would be setting the system-wide default. Users would be able to change their browser on an individual basis. Jeff
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
