fre, 17 11 2006 kl. 10:11 -0600, skrev Jeffrey C. Ollie: > On Fri, 2006-11-17 at 17:04 +0100, David Nielsen wrote: > > fre, 17 11 2006 kl. 16:52 +0100, skrev Arjan van de Ven: > > > On Fri, 2006-11-17 at 06:37 -0500, Neal Becker wrote: > > > > > > > If a new desktop is setup with kde, it must have konqueror as the browser > > > > > > Firefox also isn't the gnome default browser, but still I think Fedora > > > does the right thing to overrule BOTH desktops and give people what they > > > want. > > > > Funny as a GNOME user, the first thing I do is replace Firefox with > > Epiphany as it integrates better with my desktop. I strongly disagree > > with the argument that people move to Fedora thanks to Firefox since I > > see no hard evidence for that claim and there are advantages to be had > > by going for maximal integration. > > > > So I could definitely see why many KDE users would feel the same way > > about Konqi. Luckily this one of those things that will naturally > > resolve itself once Core and Extras gets merged, if the community by > > then wants KDE to have Konqi as the default then that will happen. > > This might make a good candidate for firstboot - during firstboot the > person installing the system could choose the default apps that newly > created users would get. Dear heavens no.. One of the strengths of the Fedora desktop is it's predefined standards. If you like me want a different set of applications there's the customize now/later option during install. - David
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dette er en digitalt underskrevet brevdel
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
