On Sun, 12 Nov 2006 18:44:42 -0500, Warren Togami wrote: > Warren Togami wrote: > > Gilboa Davara wrote: > >>> I'm pretty annoyed by this as well. So I am soon submitting an > >>> alternative short-term solution to Extras. > >>> > >>> The real solution is to make browser plugins run out-of-process. > >>> This would have tremendous benefits to us in the long-term. I am > >>> skeptical however that it will happen in a timely manner. > >>> > >> > >> You thinking about submitting nspluginwrapper? > >> > >> - Gilboa > >> > > > > No. It is broken and requires lots of work. You will see my submission > > soon. > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215256 > Yes, this really sucks. Ugly indeed. Are you serious about building this as x86_64, ppc64 and s390x, but with a non-32-bit-specific dependency on "firefox"? You end up with an x86_64 package to be used for an i386 firefox, a ppc64 package for a ppc firefox, and so on. It's also possible to uninstall 32-bit firefox and keep this package including the trigger and the menu entry. With regard to the bottom half of the %description, there is one big question: *Why* isn't it done? -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
