Re: Testing Fedora - small (?) suggestion.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le samedi 11 novembre 2006 à 13:04 -0500, Jesse Keating a écrit :
> On Saturday 11 November 2006 06:05, n0dalus wrote:
> > Maybe the yum-skip-broken plugin should be installed by default in
> > test releases. Or maybe we could just fix the build system. Any new
> > update generated by the build system that isn't installable due to
> > dependencies should be put in a temporary place until the dependent
> > packages arrive.
> 
> And then we'll never get a rawhide tree out.

Not if we block only the broken parts. You know, instead of using
testers to shame maintainers in fixing broken deps, have the buildsys do
it, and only expose sane trees to users (with the "broken" packagesets
being held where the buildsys can find them till they're complete)

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux