Re: Testing Fedora - small (?) suggestion.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Saturday 11 November 2006 04:52, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> The OP is right though that having our few rawhide users spend their
> time doing yum --exclude instead of opening & verifying bugs is hardly a
> good resource use. We have nice scripts to check repo sanity post
> release, couldn't they be run pre-release to block obviously broken
> changes ?

The broken dep isn't always something everybody would hit, and with the size 
of the package base it would be pretty hard to hold up trees from being 
released until such time the entire package set has no broken deps.  It would 
leave testers out in the cold for testing specific package functionality or 
testing bugfixes.  I think we're putting too much emphasis on rawhide being a 
completely installable tree.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora

Attachment: pgpogDvRsV1lG.pgp
Description: PGP signature

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux