On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 07:21:10PM -0500, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-11-11 at 00:48 +0100, Marcel J.E. Mol wrote:
> > After installing rawhide(-extras) x86-64 on my laptop I get the following
> > when starting gnumeric:
>
> gnumeric.i386 or gnumeric.x86_64 ?
That is another thing that puzzles me. I just ran yum install gnumeric.
% grep gnumeric /var/log/rpmpkgs
gnumeric-1.6.3-5.fc6.i386.rpm
gnumeric-1.6.3-5.fc6.x86_64.rpm
So both versions are installed, but both have /usr/bin/gnumeric-1.6.3. I guess
installing both should have given an error or so. But apperantly the 64-bit
has precedence:
% file /usr/bin/gnumeric-1.6.3
/usr/bin/gnumeric-1.6.3: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, AMD x86-64, version 1 (SYSV),
for GNU/Linux 2.6.9, dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.6.9, stripped
>
> This reminds me of an issue we had previously where e.g.
>
> - you have a 64 bit bonobo-activation-server running
>
> - 32 bit app requests activation of an shlib component (e.g. the
> OAFIID moniker)
>
> - b-a-s returns the path to a 64 bit library which the 32 bit app
> fails to load
>
> I don't think that's actually the problem, though ...
>
> > I'm running kde if that matters.
>
> That's probably the problem ... we've just updated to gnome-session
> 2.17.2 which includes this:
>
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=345428
>
> Basically, gnome-session starts at-registryd now ...
>
Right. So this needs a bit tweaking in some scripts...
% /usr/libexec/at-spi-registryd
Xlib: extension "XEVIE" missing on display ":0.0".
Suspended
% bg
[3] /usr/libexec/at-spi-registryd &
% gnumeric
Bonobo accessibility support initialized
GTK Accessibility Module initialized
And gnumeric is happily running.
-Marcel
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
