On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 11:50:51AM +0100, Adam Tkac wrote:
> I think, It's no argument to include rsh in next versions of fc/rhel.
> OpenSSH could successfully substitute this component. SSH is more secure
> than rsh and has all features of rsh. Do you think anything else??
Yes, definitely. I've spent last two years to make it useful and I
think it requires minimal time for maintenance now (it's reason why
I've left this package). We have feedback from our customers and FC
users that they need it and they use it. Reasons:
- high-performance
- security overhead
- traditional UNIX compatibility
- around us are people who use non-Linux systems and rsh is very
important for them
Maybe we're already somewhere on the way between classic UNIX and
Windows, but I think it's still to early to forget classic UNIX rule:
The right tool for the job.
Karel
--
Karel Zak <kzak@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
