On Wed, 8 Nov 2006 20:53:24 -0500, Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I assume you meant -c blowfish above, as -o doesn't seem too happy. I dunno why I typed that. Yes, of course it's -c > Oddly, -o blowfish is faster than the default. Now you're doing it :-) > Copying over a 100Mbit LAN, I get a 7MB/s by default, and 8MB/s with blowfish. I get about the same picture here, and yes, the default cipher is slower. > But for Fedora, I can't think of a valid reason why someone would want > to enable a telnetd given the security concerns of non encrypted sessions. There's one niche application: running s390 installs. Without telnet, you have to edit your .ssh/known_hosts all the time. It's quite annoying. Although I don't understand why we can't just launch a vnc server. -- Pete -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
