Once upon a time, Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx> said: > On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 08:02:12PM -0600, Chris Adams wrote: > > Once upon a time, Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx> said: > > > But for Fedora, I can't think of a valid reason why someone would want > > > to enable a telnetd given the security concerns of non encrypted sessions. > > > > For some setups, encryption is not a concern. Besides, FTP, POP3, IMAP, > > etc. are still included. > > These can be wrapped with SSL. Telnet and rsh can be used over networks that are secured in other ways. -- Chris Adams <cmadams@xxxxxxxxxx> Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
