On Thu, 2006-10-26 at 17:47 -0400, Michel Salim wrote: > On 10/26/06, Rob Andrews <rob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 26-Oct-2006 12:02.37 (BST), Gilboa Davara wrote: > > > Maybe this will be a good time to resurface this thread: > > > http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2006-August/msg00709.html > > > > Doesn't strike me as a bad idea, but you should be able to manage this by > > performing an install from a customised repository (minus all of the i386 > > arch packages), running genhdlist and installing, then ensuring any > > installations are done along the lines of: > > > > yum install <foo>.x86_64 > > > > A 'yum update' already does The Right Thing and only updates installed > > packages, so doesn't pull in any 32-bit packages that aren't already > > installed. > > > > Maybe a "64-bit pure" flag for Anaconda would help make this easier? > > > Perhaps call it "native binaries only" just in case there are more > multilib architectures in Fedora's future. > The easiest solution will be to give the user an option to add yum exclude flags during the installation. - Gibloa -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
