On 10/26/06, Rob Andrews <rob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 26-Oct-2006 12:02.37 (BST), Gilboa Davara wrote: > Maybe this will be a good time to resurface this thread: > http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2006-August/msg00709.html Doesn't strike me as a bad idea, but you should be able to manage this by performing an install from a customised repository (minus all of the i386 arch packages), running genhdlist and installing, then ensuring any installations are done along the lines of: yum install <foo>.x86_64 A 'yum update' already does The Right Thing and only updates installed packages, so doesn't pull in any 32-bit packages that aren't already installed. Maybe a "64-bit pure" flag for Anaconda would help make this easier?
Perhaps call it "native binaries only" just in case there are more multilib architectures in Fedora's future. -- Michel Salim http://www.cs.indiana.edu/~msalim -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
