On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 12:42:53PM +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > Le samedi 21 octobre 2006 à 04:14 +0200, Axel Thimm a écrit : > > > That's correct. Furthermore the FHS supports different hierarchies > > below /srv depending on the site's needs. For example a server hosting > > project1.org and project2.org would use > > > > /srv/project1.org/www and > > /srv/project2.org/www > > > > So /srv should be kept free of any package bits. I'm copying the > > packaging list, perhaps it's worth noting in the guide. > > The FHS like many things does not specify a particular policy. This > should not stop Fedora from defining one. Much better to have a > consistent well-though distro policy rather than free-for-all packager > mess Well-tought IMHO means not to impose any of the possible policies onto the user since different scenarios require different methodologies. So Fedora as a general purpose distibution should not freeze any degrees of freedom here. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgp7hA8NBRnXQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list