Le samedi 21 octobre 2006 à 04:14 +0200, Axel Thimm a écrit : > That's correct. Furthermore the FHS supports different hierarchies > below /srv depending on the site's needs. For example a server hosting > project1.org and project2.org would use > > /srv/project1.org/www and > /srv/project2.org/www > > So /srv should be kept free of any package bits. I'm copying the > packaging list, perhaps it's worth noting in the guide. The FHS like many things does not specify a particular policy. This should not stop Fedora from defining one. Much better to have a consistent well-though distro policy rather than free-for-all packager mess -- Nicolas Mailhot -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
