Re: *URGENT* Re: Another slip in the FC6 schedule

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



David Nielsen wrote:

"FC 5 and FC6 constituted the role of an alpha and now we're going
right to Beta 1 in a few weeks."
"Fedora is not a beta of RHEL". Sure! It is an alpha of RHEL :-/
Certainly it was a sarcasm...

Fedora is a powerful platform, I find it degrading and insulting to the
Fedora community that people reduce the fine work to "merely a RHEL
beta",

+1

if it was that nobody else would use it,

Unfortunately such a scenario is really possible. I know a lot of users who had switched to CentOS or similar RHEL-based systems. The main reason is to avoid stability decreasing.

Initially, such users could be good volunteers for Fedora, but it was too hard for them to handle a production system and to fix escalating amount of bugs simultaneously. The "escalating amount of bugs" can be reduced, but only after all RHEL people will really cease to consider Fedora as RHEL-alpha.


~buc


--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux