On Thu, 2006-09-28 at 16:48 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Thursday 28 September 2006 16:40, Jeremy Katz wrote: > > Sorry, there's a feature freeze for a reason. We can't just keep > > ignoring it and shoving stuff in at the last minute. Doing the swap > > later in an update is _far_ preferable as you can push it to -testing > > and let people test it out for a week or two prior to pushing to final > > -updates. > > I agree with Jeremy on this one. At this point, the Devil we know is better > than the Devil we don't. While the software may look good to you in your > testing, any number of things can go wrong in the build process leading up to > the release, and there just aren't enough days left to be really vetted. I'd > much rather see this go into -testing right after release and get some end > user eyes on it before moving to -final. As you wish. I don't agree -- I think it would be much better to ship the current packages, and there really isn't that much that can go wrong. But I do appreciate that I should have updated them earlier. -- dwmw2 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
