On Thursday 28 September 2006 16:40, Jeremy Katz wrote: > > Yes, it's far later than I'd like to be doing this, but the alternative > > is that we end up swapping them out _later_ in an erratum, which is > > _far_ more likely to be problematic. I've can make some time now to do a > > proper test of bluez stuff in advance of the fc6 release, and in fact I > > have a strong suspicion that after what I've done today, the new > > packages have probably had _more_ testing than the old ones in rawhide. > > Hands up those who've actually done any testing of bluetooth stuff in > > rawhide...? > > Sorry, there's a feature freeze for a reason. We can't just keep > ignoring it and shoving stuff in at the last minute. Doing the swap > later in an update is _far_ preferable as you can push it to -testing > and let people test it out for a week or two prior to pushing to final > -updates. I agree with Jeremy on this one. At this point, the Devil we know is better than the Devil we don't. While the software may look good to you in your testing, any number of things can go wrong in the build process leading up to the release, and there just aren't enough days left to be really vetted. I'd much rather see this go into -testing right after release and get some end user eyes on it before moving to -final. -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
pgpR9zyxBdEia.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
