Yet another dependency question. cups & redhat-lsb ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 28 Sep 2006, Naoki wrote:

# rpm -e cups
error: Failed dependencies:
      /usr/bin/lp is needed by (installed) redhat-lsb-3.1-10.3.x86_64
      /usr/bin/lpr is needed by (installed) redhat-lsb-3.1-10.3.x86_64

If nobody can see why redhat-lsb would need lp I'll file a request. I'd love to get server builds as cut down as possible.


These seem to be dragged in by part of attaining POSIX conformance

see: http://lists.freestandards.org/pipermail/lsb-wg/2005-April/000508.html

7. Commands added to align with POSIX: ed, logger, lp, mailx, pax

Note that lp as a command does not imply the "System V lp" subsystem, and for example, the "lp" that cups already provides should be quite sufficient Note also that most distros appear to have a package called mailx, but they install the binary as Mail, we believe a simply symlink would meet the requirement.

-- Russ Herrold

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux