On Mon, 2006-09-18 at 16:30 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Mon, 2006-09-18 at 11:07 -0400, Brendan Conoboy wrote: > > David Woodhouse wrote: > > > How about just building binutils, then the compiler, then some libraries? > > > > That would be great if it's possible. How is this going to work with > > only the headers supplied in binutils and gcc? > > I believe it ought to go something like > > binutils < gcc < glibc < libgcc > > We might want to put libgcc into a separate package for the > cross-toolchain, unless we can _fake_ the presence of glibc. As mentioned a dozen of times before: Simply repackage the glibc binary rpms into a sys-rooted environment (for those GCC's supporting it - Older versions don't). Ralf -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
