Le samedi 09 septembre 2006 à 16:35 -0500, Callum Lerwick a écrit : > On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 09:14 -0500, Jay Cliburn wrote: > > This gets my vote. And I agree with your usefulness opinion. I've > > never (knowingly) needed a 64-bit browser[*]. > > Running an i386 app under compatibility, especially one with a large > library stack like Firefox, adds noticeable startup lag and memory > bloat, as an entirely separate i386 version of all the libraries has to > be loaded. My personal preference would be to install both versions under x86_64, with the 64bit version the default one, and a plugin like the 'open page in ie' windows users use to access the 32 bit version. That is, until major plugins like flahs are available for 32 bit. -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
