tor, 07 09 2006 kl. 05:04 +0000, skrev Kevin Kofler: > Warren Togami <wtogami <at> redhat.com> writes: > > - Ship only i386, as that is the only useful arch. > > The "only useful arch"? Can we please quit assuming everyone needs Flash? I > don't even have Flash (or any other proprietary plugin for that matter) > installed on this i386 Fedora (I don't have a 64-bit CPU or I'd use x86_64), I > don't miss it. Down with Flash ads! Especially those which disable the option > to stop the animation or script around it. (That's what I hate about > proprietary software, they keep allowing other people to try to decide what I > do with my computer.) Agreed, I happen not to define usefulness in softwares ability to apease proprietary vendors. > > - Ship both, but hide the x86_64 launcher from users. > > I think even that isn't a great solution. Instead of this exceedingly stupid solution we could actively push gcjwebplugin, gnash and totem-plugin all of which conform to our freedom standards while providing the services our users need. No need to give up functionality for freedom when we can have both. - David -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
