On Sat, 2006-09-02 at 00:32 +0100, Leon wrote: > On Fri, 1 Sep 2006 17:38:19 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > > Leon (sdl.web@xxxxxxxxx) said: > >> > In contrast to your experience, I've always found latex/dvips to be > >> > smoother and less error prone than pdflatex. And to agree with your > >> > other point, xdvi is definitely the best DVI viewer. Viewing the .dvi > >> > >> What about Active-DVI¹. It's the one recommended by whizzytex². > > > > Objective CAML???? :) > > Just want to show there is something better than xdvi :-) I just made an rpm for advi and tried it out. It is certainly not better than xdvi. For example, it doesn't support virtual fonts, which is pretty essential nowadays. -- Gérard Milmeister Langackerstrasse 49 CH-8057 Zürich -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
