On Fri, 1 Sep 2006 17:38:19 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Leon (sdl.web@xxxxxxxxx) said: >> > In contrast to your experience, I've always found latex/dvips to be >> > smoother and less error prone than pdflatex. And to agree with your >> > other point, xdvi is definitely the best DVI viewer. Viewing the .dvi >> >> What about Active-DVI¹. It's the one recommended by whizzytex². > > Objective CAML???? :) Just want to show there is something better than xdvi :-) > > Bill -- Leon -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
