Hi Joachim, On Thu, 2006-08-31 at 18:57 +0200, Joachim Frieben wrote: > No, current "tetex-xdvi-3.0-26.1" does require "libXm.so.4" as "rpm" reports: > > "error: Failed dependencies: > libXm.so.4 is needed by tetex-xdvi-3.0-26.1.i386" > > when trying to install it. Try it again tomorrow with tetex-xdvi-3.0-27.fc6. I built it today so it's not yet available on all mirrors. > > > > Indeed tetex-xdvi is now built with Xaw. > > > > Moving tetex to extras would be certainly nice, but many packages in > > core requires it to build (for documentation). > > > > -- > > Pat > > > > -- Jindrich Novy <jnovy@xxxxxxxxxx>, http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/ (o_ _o) //\ The worst evil in the world is refusal to think. //\ V_/_ _\_V -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
