No, current "tetex-xdvi-3.0-26.1" does require "libXm.so.4" as "rpm" reports:
"error: Failed dependencies:
libXm.so.4 is needed by tetex-xdvi-3.0-26.1.i386"
when trying to install it.
>
> Indeed tetex-xdvi is now built with Xaw.
>
> Moving tetex to extras would be certainly nice, but many packages in
> core requires it to build (for documentation).
>
> --
> Pat
>
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
