On Wed, 2006-08-30 at 17:20 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Wednesday 30 August 2006 17:09, Steve Barnhart wrote: > > Forwarded to the more "technical" list following discussion. > > > > > Ya I really am saddened that no other distros have taken advantage of > > > YaST being open source. Everyone keeps wasting resources and > > > rebuilding when YaST is a good alternative and includes an ncurses gui > > > too. I really like YaST and is probably the reason I keep having a > > > hard time deciding between Fedora and openSUSE and keeping both of > > > them on my HD. Porting YaST should be way simpler for Fedora as it is > > > already RPM based. So many modules are there that rebuilding something > > > else just seems like a waste of time. > > Please god no... YAST is one of the worst systems out there. linuxconf is > pretty close too. Agreed. The last time I used it, admittedly a few years back, it was a cluttered mess to use. Also, last I heard it didn't have a gtk+ frontend yet (though I remember reading something about a summer of code project for it). /B -- Brian Pepple <bpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
