Anthony Green (green@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > On Mon, 2006-08-28 at 17:58 +0530, Rahul wrote: > > No. If the community is interested, it could start out as a second tier > > architecture. > > Does Fedora really have the notion of "second tier architecture"? > Presumably patches for second tier architectures are accepted, but bug > fixes are not considered release-critical, or something like that? We take patches, sure, as long as they're reasonably non-intrusie, don't break things, etc. There's no formal process. Bill -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
