Re: bluetooth in default desktop install?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2006-08-28 at 13:24 -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Arthur Pemberton <pemboa@xxxxxxxxx> said:
> > This would be for the fraction of laptop owners who use Gnone in
> > Fedora and use bluetooth. Isn't that too small a fraction for a
> > package to be installed by default?
> 
> Most other hardware support is included out-of-the-box.  Why should
> Bluetooth be any different?  I don't have a scanner, an HP printer, any
> computer supporting APM, etc., and they are all installed by default.  I
> _do_ have a computer with Bluetooth (although my Bluetooth mouse still
> doesn't work with rawhide).
> 
> Since most not-built-in Bluetooth interfaces are little USB dongles,
> they are definately something that could show up at any time.

Agreed -- we should just do this.  Especially since we're talk about <
half a meg. 

If that's enough to push us over to the next CD, we're likely to hit
that anyway :-P

Jeremy

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux