Re: SSHd

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeremy Katz wrote :

> On Mon, 2006-08-21 at 13:44 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> > On Mon, 2006-08-21 at 13:14 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > > It's just that realistically, changing this would essentially mean
> > > "any headless machine will not be able to be logged into without kickstart
> > > machinations". I don't think that's an improvement.
> > 
> > This is, in fact, the point.
> > 
> > Think of it this way:
> > 
> >  - httpd defaults to off when it is installed
> >    - should we have it on b/c if you can't get to the shell then you
> > can't turn it on?
> 
> One difference is that httpd doesn't provide what could well be "the
> shell"...

Nor does it provide any kind of useful service before any further
configuration is made or files put into place. OTOH, sshd as root right
after install is what I consider a useful service. From there, everyone
is free to harden the access as they wish.

Matthias

-- 
Clean custom Red Hat Linux rpm packages : http://freshrpms.net/
Fedora Core release 5.91 (FC6 Test2) - Linux kernel 2.6.17-1.2532.fc6
Load : 2.34 2.13 1.30

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux