On Mon, 2006-08-21 at 13:44 -0400, seth vidal wrote: > On Mon, 2006-08-21 at 13:14 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > It's just that realistically, changing this would essentially mean > > "any headless machine will not be able to be logged into without kickstart > > machinations". I don't think that's an improvement. > > This is, in fact, the point. > > Think of it this way: > > - httpd defaults to off when it is installed > - should we have it on b/c if you can't get to the shell then you > can't turn it on? One difference is that httpd doesn't provide what could well be "the shell"... Jeremy -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
