Rahul <sundaram <at> fedoraproject.org> writes:
> So what is the solution you are suggesting? The balance we are trying to
> reach here is avoid regressions while being a fast moving distribution.
1. Breaking a proprietary driver which was never supported is not a regression.
2. As for actual regressions (i.e. not 1.), if the upgrade fixes more than it
breaks, it is a net win. This is what needs to be evaluated, and what
updates-testing is for.
> We don't have the resources to backport fixes in Fedora in many cases.
Which is exactly why some people (including me, but several Fedora developers
too) want an upgrade.
Kevin Kofler
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
