Re: some closure on the xorg updates issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Rahul wrote:
Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
Max Spevack wrote:
4) The number of Fedora users who, due to the hardware that they own, are forced to rely on proprietary video drivers is significant enough for us to be concerned about breaking their systems.
Isn't this one of the beautiful things of RPM, which can have Conflicts set so user's systems will not be broken be an automatic (unattended?), or manual yum update? Do we not expect Fedora users to be savvy enough to get the dependency error, Google around a bit, and yum --exclude=xorg update?

Thats a very poor user experience.

Rahul

I'm sorry, but when translated, this either sounds offensive in means you find my opinion a very poor user experience, or it means user's that would encounter the above would experience it as poorly...

Kind regards,

-kanarip

--
Jeroen van Meeuwen, LPIC-1, MCP
http://www.kanarip.com/
C6B0 7FB4 43E6 CDDA D258  F70B 28DE 9FDA 9342 BF08


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux