On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 15:34 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 03:04:07PM -0400, seth vidal wrote: > > okay - then here are a couple of more situations I want to make sure are > > understood: > > yum remove foo* > > it should remove all packages starting with foo of EVERY arch or just of > > the primary arch in the biarch set? > > I would expect matches of all archs to be removed. > > > only installs the primary arch - not the secondary one - then we're > > creating some expectation of it for the others. > > Actaully, there is precedent for somewhat equivalent behavior in yum > already. If you ask for a package by name without a version, "yum install" > will just give you the latest one -- but "yum remove" will take out all > matches. > > > consistency is a good thing, I think. > > Bah. Hobgoblins and all that. :) > > But really, given the above, I don't think it is inconsistent. > In the situations where you dislike the current behavior - could you just add: exclude=*.i?86 to your /etc/yum.conf and be done w/it? -sv -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
