On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 03:04:07PM -0400, seth vidal wrote: > okay - then here are a couple of more situations I want to make sure are > understood: > yum remove foo* > it should remove all packages starting with foo of EVERY arch or just of > the primary arch in the biarch set? I would expect matches of all archs to be removed. > only installs the primary arch - not the secondary one - then we're > creating some expectation of it for the others. Actaully, there is precedent for somewhat equivalent behavior in yum already. If you ask for a package by name without a version, "yum install" will just give you the latest one -- but "yum remove" will take out all matches. > consistency is a good thing, I think. Bah. Hobgoblins and all that. :) But really, given the above, I don't think it is inconsistent. -- Matthew Miller mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx <http://mattdm.org/> Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/> -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
