tir, 08 08 2006 kl. 10:53 -0400, skrev Bill Nottingham: > David Nielsen (david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: > > > The problem with the APSL isn't GPL compatiblity as much (although > > > that didn't help); it's the patent clause. Apache is better > > > in that regard. > > > > I'm a bit confused, does better indicate that we might be legally > > allowed to use it in Fedora now or does it still make RMS cry? > > Apache license is legally feasible. Haven't actually looked at any > of the code. Thank you, that was basically the answer I was looking for, since nothing legal is stopping us it wouldn't be a waste of time to read the code. - David -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
