David Nielsen (david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: > > The problem with the APSL isn't GPL compatiblity as much (although > > that didn't help); it's the patent clause. Apache is better > > in that regard. > > I'm a bit confused, does better indicate that we might be legally > allowed to use it in Fedora now or does it still make RMS cry? Apache license is legally feasible. Haven't actually looked at any of the code. Bill -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
