lør, 05 08 2006 kl. 00:12 +0200, skrev Hans de Goede: > > Adam Jackson wrote: > > Hans de Goede wrote: > >> > >> Adam Jackson wrote: > >>> Hans de Goede wrote: > >>>> Adam Jackson <ajackson <at> redhat.com> writes: > >>>>> Requires moderately non-trivial fixes to the X server build system > >>>>> too, which is why I haven't done it yet. Probably should do > >>>>> though. I just hate to be in a situation where we're shipping CVS > >>>>> bits in > >>>>> FC6; I keep hoping Mesa will hurry up and release a 6.5.1 already. > >>>> Anything I can do to help? Are you really planning on updating mesa for > >>>> FC-6, or would it be worth my time to see if I can isolate a few > >>>> important r300 fixes and backport those? > >>> Planning a backport, yes. There are apparently enough Intel and <=R200 > >>> issues fixed in CVS that it should just be done whole. Hopefully 6.5.1 > >>> happens Really Freaking Soon so I don't have to ship CVS bits in FC6. > >>> > >>> That said, if updated srpms for mesa and xorg-x11-server were to > >>> magically appear in Bugzilla for me, I certainly wouldn't object ;) > >>> > >> > >> Magically appearing SRPM for latest mesa-CVS filed here: > >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201365 > >> > >> I've been using this with great success on an x86_64 in both 64 and 32 > >> bit mode (I compiled it in a 32 bit chroot and installed the result on > >> my 64 bit Fedora for use with googleearth). > >> > >> You also speak about xorg-x11-server changes, I haven't got any for you > >> as things work fine for me with the current xorg-x11-server in RawHide. > > > > I was expecting that build system fixes would be required, since > > xorg-x11-server builds against the mesa-source package. Have you > > attempted to rebuild the X server with a mesa-source from CVS? > > > > nope, I didn't know that the xserver is build against mesa-sources, > strange I would have thought the 2 would be pretty independent. > > Eitherway I'll be gone for a couple of days now, so I cannot try > building the X-server. Why don't you give it a shot and let me know the > result? If it turns out it needs some work, but is fixable and you would > be willing to update to mesa CVS if the work gets done for you I'm > probably willing to fix this once I'm back. > > Regards, > > Hans I decided to give this a spin on my x86_64 machine and it hit the following: mklib: Making Linux shared library: libglut.so.3.7.1 /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lXi collect2: ld returnerede afslutningskoden 1 mklib: Installing libglut.so.3.7.1 libglut.so.3 libglut.so in ../../../lib64 mv: kan ikke udføre stat() 'libglut.so.3.7.1': Ingen sådan fil eller filkatalog make[3]: *** [../../../lib64/libglut.so] Fejl 1 make[3]: Forlader katalog '/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/Mesa-6.5/src/glut/glx' make[2]: *** [subdirs] Fejl 1 make[2]: Forlader katalog '/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/Mesa-6.5/src' make[1]: *** [default] Fejl 1 make[1]: Forlader katalog '/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/Mesa-6.5' make: *** [linux-dri-x86-64] Fejl 2 fejl: Fejl-afslutningsstatus fra /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.44934 (%build) - David Nielsen -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
