Matthew Miller wrote: > On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 07:31:53PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: >>>> That might be a good idea, or a blocker bug. How do we make sure that >>>> not too many or too obscure bugs get set to this keyword / blockerbug? >>>> Just remove abusing bugs? >>> Yeah, although we'd have to carefully pick the keyword so as to not offend >>> someone if *their* pet peeve bug got removed. >> I must say I'm more in favor of a blocker bug (since I'm unfamiliar with >> the use of keywords) > > I'm not sure a blocker bug is really appropriate, as by definition it's > unlikely all the dependencies will ever be resolved. > The same goes for the FE review tracker bugs, but those are blocker bugs and work well. Regards, Hans -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
