Matthew Miller wrote: > On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 07:00:29PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: >>> Or a bugzilla keyword. >> That might be a good idea, or a blocker bug. How do we make sure that >> not too many or too obscure bugs get set to this keyword / blockerbug? >> Just remove abusing bugs? > > Yeah, although we'd have to carefully pick the keyword so as to not offend > someone if *their* pet peeve bug got removed. > I must say I'm more in favor of a blocker bug (since I'm unfamiliar with the use of keywords) > Perhaps have a way to *nominate* a bug for addition, and only add one after > a certain amount of interest? > Hmm, I think we should first come up with a tracking mechanism for bugs like this, see how it works and only create procedures surrounding this tracking mechanism if they are needed. Regards, Hans -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
