On Friday 28 July 2006 11:31, n0dalus wrote: > Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't most of this discussion about > something which currently uses X breaking? Just because it uses the > internal ABI doesn't really mean anything. Yes, the thread is about binary 3rd party modules which are outside the X tree. Which frankly, I could give a give a rip about. We break the ABI all the time with kernel updates. Users have to get the new module. This is only slightly different in that there isn't a new module yet for them. Too bad, that's an Nvidia problem, not our problem. -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
pgplQrzVRjuno.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
