Re: Leaving?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le vendredi 28 juillet 2006 à 10:02 +0200, Hans de Goede a écrit :

> I keep hearing this argument, that the packages for the involved drivers
>  can be made to conflict with the update. Which in essence will deprive
> all but the most technical of our users from security updates. So this
> is a moot argument. ?

No, this is an argument for fixing yum so it can do partial repo updates
and not block on the first problem/conflict, and yum is FLOSS so it's
within Fedora mission, so work on getting yum fixed. (again, useful
feedback why do you insist on focusing on an issue no one but NVidia can
fix?)

However to cut this thread short : unlike most technical posters you
think closed drivers could be supported with a reasonable amount of work
without hurting the rest of the system. So let's make a deal - maintain
the NVidia drivers in that-other-repo for six months, and if you make it
to the end without thinking as everyone else it's a total waste of time
and energy, we'll talk again.

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux