First we try desperately to educate users that they should always update, even write pretty applets for it and other programs that make this possible Then we tell them that they have to master editing config files and learn about exclude-lists? Sounds puzzling to me still :-) Choice is encouraging people to upgrade to RHEL, or FC6, taking away choice is putting things in updates that people without our tech knowledge would never suspect Ps, on the list I've seen a few times @redhat.com's suggesting changing to RHEL, which sounds as good as a solution to me as a @microsoft.com's suggesting upgrading to Windows XP .. in both cases they take away some of the merit of the argument your trying to make -----Original Message----- From: fedora-devel-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:fedora-devel-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Thomas M Steenholdt Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 22:58 To: fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: Fedora's intended target audience? Chris Chabot wrote: > > I thought Linux was all about choice .. so why are we arguing about taking > away this choice? > > ... I'm puzzled ... > Choice is right there to ignore the xorg updates or choose a more conservative distribution like perhaps RHEL? /Thomas -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
