On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 11:03:32AM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On Fri, 2006-07-21 at 11:38 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek wrote: > > RHBZ#: > > ------ > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195533 > > > > Description: > > ------------ > > This patch is to enable NUMA capability on the PAE 32-bit kernel. > > > NUMA has quite a few code complexity costs so... is this really worth > doing for 32 bit? Surely your new spiffy machine can do 64 bit just > fine? I'm actually more concerned about the potential that this will break non-NUMA boxes booting. Andi seemed to have a bunch of concerns in this area a while back. See http://www.x86-64.org/lists/discuss/msg09345.html Dave -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
