On Mon, 2006-07-24 at 12:40 +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On Thu, 2006-07-20 at 07:06 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: > > > > Thanks. Is there a bugzilla on this and/or when can we expect -fvisibility > > to be fixed? > > well... there is no reason to add -fvisibility with current gcc's... the > default behavior is the optimized right one already I'm not at all sure about that, if you mean 4.1.1-9 as current gcc. The unpushed gcc's >= 4.1.1-10 seem to do what OOo and qt apps want in relation to visibility. So the -fvisibility feature looks set to change in the next pushed gcc. There's still seems plenty of reason to use -fvisibility and visibility markup to reduce the number of exported C++ symbols, despite the welcome new hash and local linkage of anonymous namespace symbols. C. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
