On Thu, 2006-07-20 at 07:06 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: > Caolan McNamara wrote: > > > On Wed, 2006-07-19 at 11:18 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: > >> Rex Dieter wrote: > >> > >> I've confirmed there is no asm, and the file in question *was* built > >> with -fPIC: > >> > >> g++ -c -m64 -pipe -I/usr/include/mysql -fno-exceptions -O2 -g -pipe -Wall > >> \ -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 > >> -m64 \ -mtune=generic -fvisibility=hidden -fvisibility-inlines-hidden > >> -Wall -W \ > >> -D_REENTRANT -fPIC -DQT_SHARED -DQT_BUILD_CORE_LIB -DQT_NO_CAST_TO_ASCII > >> \ -DQT3_SUPPORT -DQT_MOC_COMPAT -DQT_NO_DEBUG -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE \ > >> -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -I../../mkspecs/linux-g++-64 -I. -I../../include \ > >> -I../../include/QtCore -Iglobal -I.moc/release-shared -I. \ > >> -o .obj/release-shared/qthread_unix.o thread/qthread_unix.cpp > > > Try disabling visibility support, it doesn't currently work in the devel > > gcc the way qt probably expects it to, i.e. add > > "-no-reduce-exports" > > to your qt4.spec's configure line > > Thanks. Is there a bugzilla on this and/or when can we expect -fvisibility > to be fixed? well... there is no reason to add -fvisibility with current gcc's... the default behavior is the optimized right one already -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
