On Wed, 2006-07-19 at 16:10 -0500, Callum Lerwick wrote: > On Tue, 2006-07-18 at 14:21 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > > The Alan Cox review of the APIs and code was discouraging to me. But > > with an active upstream, this may well be the way of the future. > > > > I'm all for esd going away (I regularly have to switch to a VT and > > killall esd in order to login or logout of my desktop) but hope we will > > move to a better system rather than repeating the same mistakes with a > > different code base. > > API shouldn't matter. The fact that polypaudio/PulseAudio (What > possessed them to name it after colon cancer, I don't know...) can > apparently plug in to ALSA is good. Very good. Exactly what should > happen. We don't need yet another audio API. He could have been talking about the protocol rather than the API, but there were issues. However, I have now read the two GNOME threads on Polypaudio/PulseAudio which has quite a bit more discussion than the abbreviated Fedora thread I read before and it looks like the PulseAudio author was very responsive and addressed most of Alan's concerns. So yes, let's make esd go away :-) (Looks like tibbs has started reviewing the pulseaudio bug for Extras. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195221 ) -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
