> Bill Nottingham wrote: > > Hans de Goede (j.w.r.degoede@xxxxxx) said: > >> Hi, > >> > >> Some time ago there was mention of moving gkrellm to Extras in the > >> Moving ImageMagick to Extras thread. > >> > >> I volunteered to maintain gkrellm and put it through the review process. > >> But I've had no response sofar. Does this mean gkrelmm is going to stay > >> in Core? Thats fine with me too. > > > > I'm ok with it in Extras from a logical point of view, leaving aside > > any maintainership/review issues. > > > > It doesn't really matter much to me, it seems well taken care of in > Core, but as said if the maintainer wants to get his hands free for > something else, then I'm game. It is a really low maintenance package, but I have no objections against moving it to Extras. It's yours if you'd like to have it. Karsten > > It could really use a cleanup packaging wise though. The wireless plugin > really should be packaged seperatly. > Yes, it is easier to get a new package in Extras than it is in RHEL ;-) Karsten -- Karsten Hopp <karsten@xxxxxxxxx> GPG 1024D/70ABD02C Fingerprint D2D4 3B6B 2DE4 464C A432 210A DFF8 A140 70AB D02C Red Hat Deutschland, Hauptstaetter Str.58 70178 Stuttgart, Tel.+49-711-96437-0, Fax +49-711-96437-111 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
