Re: Moving gkrellm to Extras?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Hans de Goede (j.w.r.degoede@xxxxxx) said: 
>> Hi,
>>
>> Some time ago there was mention of moving gkrellm to Extras in the
>> Moving ImageMagick to Extras thread.
>>
>> I volunteered to maintain gkrellm and put it through the review process.
>> But I've had no response sofar. Does this mean gkrelmm is going to stay
>> in Core? Thats fine with me too.
> 
> I'm ok with it in Extras from a logical point of view, leaving aside
> any maintainership/review issues.
> 

It doesn't really matter much to me, it seems well taken care of in
Core, but as said if the maintainer wants to get his hands free for
something else, then I'm game.

It could really use a cleanup packaging wise though. The wireless plugin
really should be packaged seperatly.

Regards,

Hans

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux