Re: Request for comments: Laptop improvements

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



David Zeuthen (david@xxxxxxxx) said: 
> That said.. I think acpid just needs to be removed from the distribution
> (acpid is fundamentally flawed in many ways) and for the time being
> (e.g. until g-p-m will run when no-one is logged in) we could ship a
> very small daemon to enforce policy for e.g. powerbutton presses. if
> g-p-m is not running (could use a nasty trick to grep the process
> list :-). It would of course listen to HAL events and if you write it in
> python it would be something like 20-50 lines of code. This could live
> in pm-utils. Bill?

Well, I'd suggest leaving it in until we have the full replacement.
It could be in the not-installed-by-default set, along with apmd.

How is the HAL/PM stack for apm these days, or is no one using
APM anyway?

Bill

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux